Evelance Matched Real Human Responses with 89.78% Accuracy

How Evelance personas predicted human responses in under 10 minutes

The Test

We tested Evelance predictions against real human responses to measure accuracy. We selected airfocus, a roadmapping tool for product teams, and ran parallel evaluations with 2 groups: 23 real people and 7 Evelance personas.

Both groups gave open feedback about the product with no scripts or leading questions. We then mapped their responses to find where themes overlapped.

89.78%
Thematic accuracy
23
Real people surveyed
7
Evelance personas tested
11/13
Categories matched

The Results

Response Alignment by Theme
Percentage mentioning each theme
Time to Insight
Research timeline comparison

What Both Groups Said

Evelance personas and real people flagged the same concerns. Both groups mentioned Jira integration as their first connection to the product. Both questioned what "AI-powered" actually meant. Both said the value proposition required extra effort to understand, and both expressed hesitation about learning another tool.

"I'm worried about becoming the guy who keeps pushing new tools on an already overwhelmed team."
— 45-year-old Head of Product persona, Seattle

A real respondent put it differently but meant the same thing: they would "keep using what we are already using since we are already familiar with Jira/Notion."

3 Weeks vs 10 Minutes

3 weeks
Real people research
10 min
Evelance personas

It took us 3 weeks to collect feedback from 23 real people between recruiting, scheduling, following up, and compiling their responses. Evelance gave us the same insights in under 10 minutes.

How Evelance Compares

Dimension Real People Evelance Personas
Time to Insight 2-4 weeks Under 10 minutes
Accuracy to Real Behavior 100% (baseline) 89.78% validated
Audience Targeting Limited by recruitment 2M+ Evelance Personas, 1,700+ job types
Behavioral Memory Full life history Absorbed behavioral data
Context Awareness Real circumstances Time, stress, environment factors
Response Authenticity Genuine reactions Internalized identity shapes response
Cost Per Response $57+ per participant $2.99 per persona
Scheduling Required Yes, with no-shows None
Psychology Framework Requires analysis 12 dimensions built-in
Repeatability Different people each time Same persona, consistent baseline

The Bottom Line

Evelance predicted how real people would respond to airfocus with 89.78% accuracy. The personas flagged the same concerns, valued the same features, and expressed the same hesitations.

This does not mean you skip talking to real users. It means you already know what they will say before you ask.