Oct 16,2025 
Jakob’s Law states that people spend most of their time using products other than yours. This principle, formulated by Jakob Nielsen, describes how users develop expectations based on their cumulative experiences across all the interfaces they encounter. When someone visits your website or uses your application, they bring mental models shaped by thousands of previous interactions with other products.
The law emerged from Nielsen’s extensive research into usability patterns. In 1994, he analyzed 249 usability problems from 11 professional projects against 101 fundamental usability principles. This analysis created a matrix containing 25,149 datapoints. The resulting insights revealed that users consistently struggled when interfaces deviated from established patterns they had learned elsewhere. Nielsen’s work showed that forcing users to learn new interaction patterns increases cognitive load and often leads to task abandonment.
The Psychology Behind Pattern Recognition
Pattern recognition forms the cognitive foundation that makes Jakob’s Law work. Our brains constantly match incoming sensory information against stored memories. When we encounter a shopping cart icon in the top right corner of a website, we immediately know its function because we’ve seen this pattern hundreds of times before. This automatic recognition happens without conscious effort.
The cognitive process becomes more complex when patterns break. If that shopping cart appears in the bottom left corner, users must stop and think. They need to consciously process this deviation from the expected pattern. This interruption might take only milliseconds, but it compounds across multiple unconventional design choices. Each deviation requires mental processing power that could otherwise focus on the user’s actual goals.
Mental Models and User Expectations
Mental models represent a user’s assumptions about how things work. These models form through repeated exposure to similar systems. When someone approaches a new e-commerce site, they carry mental models built from shopping on Amazon, Nike, and dozens of other platforms. They expect product images on the left, descriptions and prices on the right, and an add-to-cart button prominently displayed near the price.
Nielsen’s research demonstrates that users feel confused and frustrated when they face uncommon patterns in design. According to his findings, users tend to abandon tasks and leave sites when confronted with unfamiliar interaction patterns. This abandonment happens because the cognitive effort required to learn new patterns often exceeds the user’s motivation to complete their task. The friction created by unconventional design choices directly impacts conversion rates and user satisfaction metrics.
Standard Design Conventions in Practice
E-commerce platforms demonstrate Jakob’s Law through remarkable consistency in their layouts. Product pages across Nike, Amazon, Myntra, and Flipkart follow nearly identical structures. Product images appear on the left side of the screen. Descriptions, sizing information, and prices occupy the right side. The add-to-cart button sits prominently below the price, typically on the right side of the product page. The shopping cart icon lives in the top right corner of the header.
This consistency exists because retailers discovered through testing and iteration that these patterns work. Users can shop efficiently when they don’t need to hunt for basic functions. A customer moving from Amazon to Nike doesn’t need to relearn how to add items to their cart or find product specifications. The familiar patterns allow them to focus on evaluating products rather than figuring out the interface.
The YouTube Redesign: A Case Study in Change Management
YouTube’s 2024 redesign provides a compelling example of how even necessary updates can create user friction. The platform rolled out its most extensive visual overhaul in more than a decade, introducing a refreshed interface based on Google’s Material Design 3. The update brought translucent backgrounds and rounded, capsule-shaped buttons that sit more cleanly over video content.
User reactions revealed the challenge of changing familiar interfaces. One user described the new theater mode on a 32-inch monitor as creating “the worst first impression you can get from this new UI.” The playback controls appeared so large and expansive that the interface “genuinely looked broken at first glance.” Mobile users reported fewer issues, as the condensed format better accommodated the new design elements. This split reaction demonstrates how the same design changes affect different user contexts differently.
Instagram’s Grid Controversy
Instagram’s 2025 transition from square to rectangular grids sparked immediate backlash from its user base. The platform changed profile displays to a 1080×1350 pixel vertical format after testing on select users throughout 2024. Adam Mosseri, Instagram’s head, explained that the redesign reflected how most users now post vertical content. He argued that the rectangular format better showcases photos and videos in an engaging way.
The user response was swift and negative. Photographers and content creators who had spent years building aesthetically consistent feeds found their carefully curated grids disrupted overnight. Hashtags like BringBackTheGrid trended across social media platforms. Users expressed anger that their visual portfolios, built according to the square format Instagram had maintained for a decade, suddenly looked misaligned and unprofessional.
The Cost of Breaking Expectations
Instagram’s redesign illustrates what happens when platforms violate deeply ingrained user expectations. Creators had built entire strategies around the square grid format. They had purchased templates, planned content calendars, and developed posting patterns optimized for square presentations. The sudden change forced them to reconsider years of established practices.
Mosseri later apologized for catching users off guard, acknowledging that the update disrupted the aesthetic of their posts. Yet the damage to user trust had already occurred. Experts now recommend keeping all critical visual elements within the old 1080×1080 pixel square safe zone, anticipating that Instagram might revert to its original format. This hedging strategy shows how uncertainty about interface stability forces users to adopt defensive design practices.
Balancing Innovation with Familiarity
The tension between innovation and familiar patterns creates ongoing challenges for designers. Following Jakob’s Law too rigidly leads to stagnant interfaces that never improve. Every website begins to look identical, offering no competitive differentiation. Yet departing too far from established patterns risks user abandonment and frustration.
Successful innovation happens incrementally within familiar frameworks. Gmail revolutionized email interfaces but retained the basic inbox/sent/drafts folder structure users expected. Spotify transformed music consumption while keeping play, pause, and skip controls in predictable locations. These products innovated in their core value propositions while respecting established interaction patterns for basic functions.
Research Methods for Understanding User Expectations
Applying Jakob’s Law effectively requires understanding what patterns your specific users expect. Usability testing reveals where users look for particular functions and what conventions they assume will apply. Card sorting exercises help identify how users mentally organize information and features. Analytics data shows where users click when hunting for specific functions, revealing their expectations about element placement.
User interviews provide qualitative insights into mental models. Asking users to describe how they expect certain features to work, or having them predict where they’ll find specific functions before seeing your interface, uncovers assumptions they bring from other products. This research should examine both direct competitors and products from adjacent categories that users regularly interact with.
Common Implementation Patterns
Navigation structures follow remarkably consistent patterns across websites. Primary navigation appears either horizontally across the top of the page or vertically along the left side. User account controls cluster in the top right corner. Search bars sit in the header, either centered or aligned to the right. Footer navigation contains legal links, company information, and supplementary navigation items.
Form designs demonstrate similar standardization. Labels appear above or to the left of input fields. Required fields show asterisks or other indicators. Error messages appear near the problematic field in red or another warning color. Submit buttons align to the right or center below the form fields. These patterns have become so standard that deviating from them measurably increases form abandonment rates.
Mobile Interface Conventions
Mobile interfaces have developed their own set of standard patterns. The hamburger menu icon, three horizontal lines, universally signals a hidden navigation menu. Tab bars at the bottom of the screen provide primary navigation on iOS apps, while Android apps traditionally use top tabs or navigation drawers. Pull-to-refresh gestures update content feeds. Swiping horizontally moves between screens or dismisses elements.
These mobile conventions evolved differently from desktop patterns due to the constraints and affordances of touchscreens. The thumb zone influences where interactive elements appear. The limited screen space necessitates hidden navigation patterns. Yet within these mobile-specific constraints, consistent patterns emerged across applications, creating expectations that new apps must consider.
The Role of Cognitive Load
Cognitive load describes the mental effort required to use an interface. Familiar patterns reduce cognitive load by allowing automatic processing. Users don’t consciously think about clicking a logo to return home or looking top-right for account settings. These actions happen through learned automaticity, freeing mental resources for the user’s actual tasks.
When interfaces break expected patterns, cognitive load increases dramatically. Users must consciously process each interaction, questioning their assumptions and hunting for functions. This increased mental effort leads to slower task completion, more errors, and greater frustration. In environments where users have alternatives, high cognitive load drives them to competing products that feel easier to use.
Platform-Specific Considerations
Different platforms establish distinct convention sets. Windows applications place menus at the top of windows, while macOS applications use a system-wide menu bar. iOS apps use specific gestures and navigation patterns that Android apps implement differently. Web applications follow browser conventions that desktop applications might ignore.
Users switch between these platforms throughout their day, maintaining separate mental models for each environment. A function accessed through a right-click context menu on desktop might appear in a long-press menu on mobile. These platform-specific patterns mean that cross-platform products must balance consistency with their own interface against consistency with platform conventions.
Documentation and Onboarding Strategies
Even when following Jakob’s Law, some unique functionality requires explanation. Onboarding flows teach users about features that deviate from standard patterns. However, the need for extensive onboarding often signals over-innovation in basic interactions. If users need tutorials for fundamental tasks, the interface probably violates too many expected conventions.
Effective onboarding focuses on unique value propositions rather than basic navigation. Slack’s onboarding doesn’t explain how to send messages, since that follows familiar chat application patterns. Instead, it introduces channels, integrations, and workflow features that differentiate Slack from basic messaging apps. This approach respects users’ existing knowledge while highlighting genuine innovations.
Measuring Success Through Usability Metrics
Interfaces that successfully apply Jakob’s Law show measurable improvements in key metrics. Task completion rates increase when users find functions where expected. Time-on-task decreases as users navigate efficiently through familiar patterns. Error rates drop because users correctly predict how interface elements behave.
Support ticket volume provides another indicator. When users constantly ask how to perform basic tasks, the interface likely violates expected patterns. High bounce rates on key pages might indicate that users can’t find expected functions quickly enough. These metrics help teams identify where their interfaces create unnecessary friction through unfamiliar patterns.
Industry-Specific Pattern Languages
Different industries develop specialized pattern languages beyond general web conventions. Banking applications consistently place account balances prominently at the top of the screen. News sites organize content in familiar article layouts with headlines, bylines, and body text in predictable arrangements. Social media platforms use feed-based layouts with consistent interaction patterns for liking, commenting, and sharing.
These industry patterns layer on top of general web conventions. An e-commerce site follows both universal patterns like logo placement and industry patterns like product gallery layouts. Users moving between competitors in the same industry expect these specialized patterns to remain consistent, creating additional constraints on innovation.
The Evolution of Design Standards
Design patterns evolve gradually through collective iteration. The hamburger menu didn’t exist before mobile interfaces needed space-saving navigation solutions. Once introduced, it spread across applications until it became an expected standard. Similarly, infinite scroll emerged as a pattern for content feeds, gradually replacing pagination in many contexts.
This evolution happens through careful observation of what works. Designers notice successful patterns in popular applications and adopt them for similar use cases. Users encounter these patterns repeatedly until they become expected conventions. The process takes years, with patterns achieving standard status only after widespread adoption proves their effectiveness.
Accessibility and Familiar Patterns
Familiar patterns particularly benefit users with disabilities. Screen reader users rely on consistent heading structures and navigation patterns. Users with motor impairments develop muscle memory for common interaction targets. Cognitive disabilities make learning new patterns especially difficult, making consistency across sites essential for these users.
Accessibility guidelines often codify familiar patterns into requirements. Form labels must associate with their inputs in predictable ways. Navigation landmarks must appear in expected locations. These guidelines don’t arbitrary impose structure but instead document patterns that testing has proven most usable for people with disabilities.
International Variations in Expectations
User expectations vary across cultures and regions. Reading direction affects where users expect important elements to appear. Color associations carry different meanings in different cultures. Payment methods and checkout flows reflect regional preferences and regulations.
Chinese web design often appears denser and more colorful than Western designs, reflecting different aesthetic preferences and learned patterns. Middle Eastern sites might mirror Western layouts for right-to-left reading. These variations show that Jakob’s Law applies within cultural contexts, with users expecting consistency with other sites from their region rather than global uniformity.
When Breaking Conventions Makes Sense
Sometimes breaking established patterns serves specific goals. Artistic portfolios might use unconventional navigation to create memorable experiences. Experimental interfaces might intentionally challenge expectations to provoke thought or demonstrate technical capabilities. Games often deliberately obscure interface elements to increase challenge or immersion.
These departures from convention work when users expect and desire them. A creative agency’s website might frustrate users seeking efficiency but delight those seeking inspiration. The key lies in matching interface choices to user goals and contexts. Breaking conventions becomes problematic when it interferes with users accomplishing their intended tasks.
Testing Pattern Effectiveness
A/B testing reveals how pattern changes affect user behavior. Testing conventional against unconventional placements for key functions quantifies the impact of familiarity. These tests often show that even small deviations from expected patterns reduce conversion rates and increase task abandonment.
Longitudinal studies track how user expectations change over time. A pattern considered unconventional might become expected after sufficient exposure. These studies help teams understand when emerging patterns have gained enough adoption to implement safely. They also reveal when established patterns have become outdated and ready for replacement.
Building Design Systems Around Familiar Patterns
Design systems codify familiar patterns for consistent implementation across products. These systems document where navigation appears, how forms structure themselves, and what interaction patterns apply to different component types. By establishing these standards, teams ensure their products maintain both internal consistency and alignment with external expectations.
Component libraries implement these patterns in reusable code. A button component embodies expected behaviors like hover states and click feedback. A navigation component implements standard information architecture patterns. These libraries reduce the temptation to reinvent basic interactions while allowing innovation in unique product features.
Looking Forward
Jakob’s Law remains relevant because it describes fundamental human behavior rather than specific technologies. As interfaces evolve from screens to voice to augmented reality, users will still develop expectations based on their accumulated experiences. The specific patterns will change, but the principle of leveraging familiarity will persist.
Understanding and applying Jakob’s Law requires ongoing observation of emerging patterns and user expectations. Designers must balance respect for established conventions with thoughtful innovation that pushes interfaces forward. Success comes from knowing when to follow familiar patterns and when unique functionality justifies teaching users something new. The goal isn’t blind conformity but intentional choices about where familiarity serves users and where innovation provides value worth the cognitive cost of learning new patterns.
LLM? Download this Content’s JSON Data or View The Index JSON File