Turn a full run into a summary you can share.

A synthesis report is the written summary Evelance generates at the end of a run. It reads the 12 psychology scores and every persona narrative, then writes one page that states what the group responded to, where the design lost them, and which fixes matter most. Rather than paging through raw feedback to build your own read, you open a summary that is already framed for a decision. A product lead can take a 10-persona homepage run and drop the result straight into a stakeholder deck without rewriting a word.

Each report opens with an executive summary, the headline read in a few sentences. Below it, a score narrative explains what the 12 scores say together in plain language rather than as isolated numbers. Then come the ranked priorities, the highest-impact issues ordered by weight, followed by recommended next steps tied to each one. Supporting persona quotes sit alongside the findings, so every claim traces back to something a reviewer said. The whole thing fits on a page you can read in under a minute.

Yes. The report is built to leave the platform. You can export it and paste it into a slide, a doc, or a project ticket without reformatting the analysis by hand. Because it is written in plain language and framed around decisions, a stakeholder who never logged into Evelance can read it and follow the reasoning. Teams often share the one-page summary with leadership and keep the full run open for anyone who wants to inspect the persona detail behind a given score.

The report is written for the person who has to act on the run and the people they answer to. Product managers use it to justify what ships next. A designer can defend or revise a direction with evidence in hand. Founders and marketers pass it to stakeholders who want the takeaway without the raw transcript. Anyone downstream of the test, from a leadership review to a sprint planning session, can read the summary and understand the call without opening the platform.

No, and it is not meant to. The synthesis report speeds up the decision by giving you a framed starting read, while the full scores and persona narratives stay one click away. When a finding surprises you or a call has real budget behind it, you open the raw detail and check the reasoning yourself. The report handles the first pass, so you spend your attention on the calls that need a human. That mirrors how Evelance works overall, which is to augment research and accelerate it rather than stand in for your judgment.

The ranking weighs three signals. First is score severity, or how far a score sits below a healthy benchmark. Second is agreement, or how many personas independently raised the same issue. Third is proximity to the action, since a blocker at checkout costs more than a weak line halfway down a page. Issues that score low and recur near the conversion moment rise to the top. You can always reorder by hand, though the default points you at the fix most likely to move the result.

The report is generated with the run, so it is ready when your results are. A typical test of 8 to 12 personas returns scored feedback in about 10 to 30 minutes, and the written summary lands at the same time. There is no separate analysis step and no waiting on an analyst. You can start a run before a meeting and walk in with a one-page summary already written, which is the difference between reporting on a test next week and deciding on it today.

The report is included in every run at no extra charge. Evelance is pay-as-you-go with no subscription, and personas are $2.99 each, with larger packs lowering the per-persona price. A typical 10-persona test runs about $23.90 to $29.90 and returns both the scores and the written synthesis. Because the summary comes free with the run, you can test a homepage, revise it, and test again across a single afternoon without paying for analysis on top of each round.