See exactly where you win and where you lose.

You upload your design and one or more competitor pages, choose a single audience, and Evelance scores every design on the same 12 psychology scores. The personas review each design against the same brief, then the results return as a ranking with a per-score breakdown. Because the audience and the framework never change between designs, the ranking reflects the work itself rather than a difference in who happened to review it. You can benchmark a live product page, a checkout flow, a pricing layout, or a full homepage, and run the comparison again after you iterate to confirm the gap closed.

No. Competitive testing runs entirely on your side. You point Evelance at a competitor's live URL or drop in a screenshot, and their design is scored by the same personas that review yours. The competitor takes no part, grants no permission, and never sees that a benchmark ran. That means you can compare against anyone in your category, including the leader you would never get into a shared research study, and you can do it as often as you ship.

Anything you can point to or capture. A live website or app URL works directly, and a screenshot or exported image works when the page sits behind a login, a paywall, or a checkout step you cannot reach. You can also benchmark a design file or prototype against a competitor's live page, which is useful before launch when you want to know whether the version in Figma already beats what is shipping today.

You can rank your design against several competitors in one run. Two or three is the common setup because it keeps the ranking readable and maps to the real shortlist a buyer weighs. There is no hard ceiling, so a broader category scan works when you want to see where you sit across the whole field. Each added design brings its own set of personas into the run.

Fairness comes from holding two things constant. The audience is one shared set of personas, so no design gets an easier crowd. The framework is the same 12 psychology scores on a 1 to 10 scale, so a Credibility number on your page means the same thing as a Credibility number on a competitor. Evelance personas agree with real-user feedback at 89.78%, so the comparison rests on scoring measured against people rather than assumed. The result is a like-for-like read where a lead or a gap is a number you can defend.

The gap breakdown lines up all 12 scores for your design against the strongest competitor result on each one. Every score shows your value, the competitor value, and the difference between them, so you can see the places you clearly lead and the places a rival is ahead. The trailing scores are the useful part. They turn a vague sense that a competitor feels more trustworthy into a specific Credibility gap of a known size, which tells you what to fix first.

A run returns in about 10 to 30 minutes, and adding competitors changes little because the designs are scored in parallel rather than one after another. A benchmark that would take weeks of recruiting and moderated sessions becomes something you read the same afternoon. That speed is what lets competitive testing sit inside a normal sprint, so you can baseline against a rival and re-rank the fixes before the work ships.

Pricing is pay-as-you-go with no subscription. Personas are $2.99 each, and a typical run uses 8 to 12 personas per design, so a single design usually costs about $23.90 to $29.90. A three-way benchmark scores each design with its own personas, so budget for a run per design rather than one flat fee. Larger packs lower the per-persona price, and because a full comparison costs a fraction of one moderated study, most teams re-benchmark on every meaningful iteration instead of once a quarter.